Shiportrade

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Carrier Performance Tracker

Compare performance metrics across major ocean carriers

Free Tool10 Major CarriersReal-time Metrics

Carriers

10

Metrics

6 Key

Historical Data

12 months

Overall Score

100 pts

Carrier AnalyticsPerformance KPIsVendor Management

Carrier Performance Tracker

Monitor and compare performance metrics of major ocean carriers worldwide. Make data-driven decisions for your supply chain with comprehensive analytics.

10

Carriers

6

Trade Lanes

84.2%

Avg Score

24.3M

Total TEU

Avg Schedule Reliability

75.7%

Avg On-Time Performance

79.3%

Avg Booking Acceptance

89.3%

Avg Doc Accuracy

94.9%

Industry Average

84.2/100

Select Carrier
Choose a carrier to view performance
MSK

Maersk Line

Est. 1904

Fleet:708 vessels
Capacity:4.2M TEU
Region:Global
Last Updated:2024-01-15
Performance Score
Good
87.6

/ 100

Schedule Reliability

78.5%

Vessel On-Time

82.3%

Booking Acceptance

91.2%

Doc Accuracy

96.8%

Claim Ratio

1.2%

Overall Score

87.6%

Performance Radar
Multi-factor analysis of carrier performance
Top Performers
Leading carriers by overall performance score
1

Hapag-Lloyd

Global

89.4
Good
2

ONE

Global

88.2
Good
3

Maersk Line

Global

87.6
Good

Stay Updated

Performance data is updated monthly with the latest carrier metrics.

Schedule Reliability

Schedule reliability measures the percentage of voyages arriving within 24 hours of the scheduled arrival time. It's a critical indicator of carrier performance and directly impacts supply chain planning.

Industry benchmark: The global average schedule reliability hovers around 70-75%, with top performers consistently achieving 80%+.

Tip: For time-sensitive cargo, prioritize carriers with 80%+ schedule reliability.

On-Time Performance

On-time performance tracks vessel punctuality for both departures and arrivals. This metric reflects operational efficiency and port turnaround capabilities.

Key factors: Port congestion, weather conditions, vessel maintenance, and crew availability all impact on-time performance.

Tip: Check both departure and arrival punctuality for complete visibility.

Booking Acceptance

Booking acceptance rate measures the percentage of booking requests accepted without rollover or rejection. Higher rates indicate better capacity availability.

Why it matters: Low acceptance rates may lead to cargo delays, rollovers, and the need for alternative routing.

Tip: Book 2-3 weeks in advance to improve acceptance rates during peak seasons.

Documentation Accuracy

Documentation accuracy measures the correctness of shipping documents including bills of lading, manifests, and customs paperwork. Errors can lead to customs delays, additional costs, and compliance issues.

  • Reduces customs clearance delays
  • Minimizes demurrage and detention risks
  • Ensures compliance with regulations
Claim Ratio

Claim ratio indicates the percentage of shipments with filed claims for damage, loss, or delays. Lower ratios suggest better cargo handling and service quality.

  • Industry average: 1.5% - 2.0%
  • Top performers: below 1.0%
  • Higher ratios may indicate handling issues
Major Ocean Carriers Covered
Top 10 container shipping lines by TEU capacity
MSK

Maersk Line

4.15M TEU

Global

MSC

MSC

4.80M TEU

Global

CMDU

CMA CGM

3.40M TEU

Global

COS

COSCO Shipping

2.90M TEU

Global

HLCU

Hapag-Lloyd

2.10M TEU

Global

EGSU

Evergreen

1.65M TEU

Asia-Pacific

ONEY

ONE

1.60M TEU

Global

YMLU

Yang Ming

720K TEU

Asia-Pacific

HMM

HMM

820K TEU

Asia-Pacific

ZIM

ZIM

580K TEU

Global

Pro Tips
  • Compare multiple carriers before booking time-sensitive cargo
  • Consider overall score over individual metrics
  • Check historical trends for seasonal patterns
  • Balance cost vs. reliability based on cargo urgency
  • Review claim ratios for high-value shipments
  • Monitor performance trends quarterly for contract negotiations
Common Mistakes
  • Choosing carriers based on price alone
  • Ignoring schedule reliability for time-critical cargo
  • Not checking trade lane-specific performance
  • Overlooking documentation accuracy for compliance
  • Failing to review carrier performance regularly
  • Not diversifying carrier portfolio
Frequently Asked Questions